SIGN PETITION FOR DEATH ROW INMATE THOMAS ARTHUR TO RECEIVE NEW TRIAL!!

Now that DNA testing has been completed on some of the evidence in the Thomas Arthur case, and it being NEGATIVE...(not matching Thomas Arthur)...PLEASE join the ever growing number of people to sign the Petition to grant Thomas Arthur a new trial. (Testing of a hair from the wig worn by the rapist of Judy Wicker, and murderer of Judy Wicker's husband Troy Wicker, cannot be done, as the hair has DISAPPEARED). (Testing of the rape kit, cannot be done, because it also disappeared).

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/save-thomas-d-arthur-from-execution-09-27-2007

Well, well, WELL! Defamation of Character Suit brings Out The TRUE BULLIES.

I have been receiving all kinds of messages from Deborah Jansons in Ontario, Canada. (3 within a half an hour's time span, 4 today, alone). Seems she would like for me to post some anonymous messages for her on my website about Anika Wilson. These messages are very slanderous and would certainly defame Anika's character even more. Sorry, Deb, no can do! I would not, COULD NOT allow slanderous and utterly stupid comments like what you sent to me, on my site. Deborah Jansons is a regular poster on Kristen Jones' website (bamakrissy), and has defamed me on Kristen Jones' site, in the past on quite a few occasions. However, I will not allow her to use my website to trash someone else's good character. From the things that Deborah has sent to me to be posted, it would "appear" that she seems to know Anika. (Is it "possible" that Ms. Jansons is one of the people that has been anonymously posting on the al.com forums about Anika Wilson, herself?)...Either she has first hand knowledge of a Judge's ruling that Anika Wilson and her attorney don't have privy to, or she could be one of the anonymous posters. This is the exact wording in one of the comments that was sent to me by Deborah Jansons to be posted anonymously... "The judge said that Ms. Wilson has no case. She is clearly insanely jealous of the defendant and is wasting the court's time." .....How would Deborah Jansons know what a judge said? (Is she privy to a judge's decisions before they are published? Does Jansons know this judge, personally and have first hand knowledge of something we don't?) I'm sorry, but I just don't buy it. I give this judge a little more credit than to be passing out opinions and rulings to Deborah before even the attorneys are aware of it. Jansons has also alluded she knows something about Wilson's sexual orientation, yet gives no sources for her information.... It's a good thing I can weed out trash before it makes it to my website. Jansons, take this kind of trashy talk to Kristen Jones' website. She has a "no deletions" policy, even if it is defamation and slander. I'm sure you can get your "anonymous comments" published there.

Franklin County Judge Sentences Christie Michelle Scott's to Death

A Franklin County Circuit Judge sentenced Christie Michelle Scott to death for the murder of her young 6 year old son, Mason. Mason died in a fire which investigators said was caused by his mother for $175,000 in insurance money, $100,000 of it which was purchased just 12 hours before his death. These kind of cases just make me shudder when I think "how could a mother do this?". Evidently the jury believed that she did kill her son for monetary gain. The judge overrode the jury's recommendation of a life sentence, and sentenced her, instead to death, stating, "The capital offense was particularly heinous, atrocious and cruel compared to other capital offenses. There may be no more painful way for a human to die than by fire. It is not certain whether the victim died from thermal burns or smoke inhalation. A high carbon monoxide level in the victim's blood ... indicate he was still breathing as he was burning. This would be a horrific death with immense pain for the victim."

I would be interested in hearing feedback from others on this case. What do you think about this case? Do you believe in the purchase of large insurance policies? Usually a person will purchase a rather large policy to cover mortgages, automobiles, etc. I have, however, read of MANY cases where people killed their "loved ones" for high insurance claims. Money can't buy love, but it certainly can buy a jail term, or death. I certainly can't see how a mother could kill her own child for monetary gain. If this is really the truth in Christie's case, then she does deserve the death penalty. I am still stuck on how Susan Smith could have let her two beautiful little boys drown, or how Andrea Yates could have drowned her FIVE beautiful children back in 2001. Crimes like this are so horrible and leave a hole in our hearts when we think of the suffering of these children.